Connect with us

BSM Writers

The Game Makes a Comeback in Chicago



Remember “The Game”—the Chicago sports radio station? Well I wouldn’t blame you if you didn’t. The Tribune broadcasting sports effort lasted less than a year on the air at 87.7 FM. It may actually be best known for midday host Ben Finfer finding out about the shutdown of the station while hosting his show on the air!

As a quick refresher course, here was the station’s weekday lineup:

6-9a: The Johnny B Show with Jonathon Brandmeier & Buzz Killman (Non Sports)

9a-12p: Kap & Haugh (David Kaplan and David Haugh)

12-3p: Quigs and Finfer (Alex Quigley and Ben Finfer)

3-7p: Jarrett, Harry & Spike (Jarrett Payton, Harry Teinowitz and Spike Manton)

7p-10p: The Night Game with Carms and Connor (Mark Carman and Connor McKnight)

The man behind the start-up and shut down of the “The Game” is Jim deCastro. “Jimmy” to those who know him, made a name for himself in Chicago radio in the 1980s and 1990s with a powerhouse, talent-laden station—the AM Loop and the broadcast company AMFM. 

More recently you may know him as the President and GM of WGN Radio. During his tenure, WGN lost the Cubs. WGN Radio and the Cubs had been synonymous since 1925. Not only that, but the Cubs produce huge ratings and with more day games than any other team in baseball—those ratings are happening in midday and afternoon drive. WGN loses the Cubs in 2014; the Cubs win the World Series in 2016 with play by play on The Score/Chicago-A CBS (now Entercom) radio station. 

So follow the bouncing ball. The man who started a failed sports station and lost a key asset at a heritage radio station—WGN– leaves Tribune Broadcasting in October of 2016. A little over one year later deCastro is picked by Entercom as the Chicago Market Manager in charge of six radio stations, including The Score. This is where The Game comes back into play. 

In less than a year after taking over The Score, deCastro replaced Score Midday mainstay Matt Spiegel with Connor McKnight. Earlier this week, it was announced that morning host Brian Hanley will not be returning to the “Mully and Hanley” show which has anchored mornings at The Score since 2008 and produced exceptional ratings. In May “Mully & Hanley” rated No. 2 in Chicago with a 6.8 share among men 25-54. 

Who is most likely to replace Hanley at The Score? The consensus is David Haugh, Sports Columnist at the Chicago Tribune. Yep, he was a host on The Game.

So in less than a year on the job, deCastro has replaced three long-time Score personalities (Hanley, Spiegel, Goff) with two hosts from The Game and one he really wanted at The Game (McNeil). I was scratching my head.

I talked to a sports radio insider to try and make some sense of this: “It’s seriously crazy. I understood the McNeil for Goff move. If he (deCastro) wanted someone who fit his style better that’s fine. It’s not like Dan (McNeil) hadn’t produced before. Spiegel for McKnight though made little sense and dropping Hanley when all he’s done is produce (ratings) for them is stunning!”

So I thought about it a lot today. Then it came to me. I realized what is happening at The Score. DeCastro is using The Score to try and prove a point—likely something only he cares about. 

The point?–the failure of The Game wasn’t his. To prove that, deCastro is hiring former hosts from The Game to replace hosts at The Score. That’s it. That’s the whole reason. This version of The Game has a strong signal, the Cubs, and 26 years on the air. 

PS–I found someone who is even happier than DeCastro with these moves—his name is Adam Delevitt. He’s the Program Director of cross-town rival ESPN 1000. 

Editor’s Note: Matt Fishman worked at The Score in Chicago from 1994-2003

BSM Writers

Asking The Right Questions Helps Create Interesting Content

Asking questions that can get a subject to talk about their feelings is a much better way to get an interesting answer.



USA Today

When ESPN’s Mike Greenberg interviewed Paolo Banchero in the lead-up to the NBA lottery on Tuesday, he asked what I’ve concluded is the single most maddening question that can be asked of any athlete preparing for any draft.

“Why do you believe you should be No. 1 pick in the NBA Draft?” Greenberg said.

Before I point out exactly why I have such a visceral reaction to such a harmless question, I want to point out the positives because Greenberg’s question avoids some of the most common pitfalls:

1) It is an actual question. That’s not as automatic as you think given the number of poor souls who are handed a microphone and say to their subject, “Talk about (whatever issue they want a quote or a sound bite on).” This is the mark of an amateur, creating the opening for an uncooperative subject to slam the door by saying, “What do you want me to say?”

2) Greenberg’s question can not be answered with a yes or a no. Questions that start with the word “Can you …” or “Did you …” may sound like they’re tough questions for the subject, but they’re actually fairly easy if the subject wants to offer an answer. Now, most interview subjects won’t take that one-word exit, but some will in a touchy situation.

The problem with Greenberg’s question has to do with the result. Why do we ask questions of the athletes we cover? Seriously. That’s not rhetorical. What’s the goal? It’s to get interesting answers. At least that’s the hope whether it’s for a quote that will be included in a story, a sound bite to be replayed later or — like in this situation — during an interview that is airing live. The question should be engineered to elicit interesting content, and there was very little chance that the question Greenberg asked Banchero was going to produce anything close to that.

I know that because I have heard some version of this question asked hundreds of times. That’s not an exaggeration. I attended the NFL scouting combine annually for a number of years, and if a player wasn’t asked why he should be the first overall pick, he’d get asked why he should be a first-round pick or why he should be one of the first players chosen at his position. Never — in all that time — have I ever heard what would be considered an interesting or informative answer. In my experience, players tend to talk in incredibly general terms about their own abilities and then seek to compliment their peers in an effort to avoid coming off as cocky.

Here’s how Banchero answered Greenberg’s question: “Yeah, thank you all for having me, first off., I feel like I’m the number one pick in the draft because I’m the best overall player. I feel like I check all the boxes whether it’s being a great teammate, being the star player or doing whatever the coach needs. I’ve been a winner my whole life. Won everywhere I’ve went, and when I get to the NBA, that’s going to be the same goal for me. So just combining all those things, and knowing what I have to work on to be better is a formula for me.”

There’s nothing wrong with answer just as there was nothing wrong with the question. It’s just that both are really, really forgettable. ESPN did put a clip on YouTube with the headline “Paolo Banchero: I’m the best overall player in the NBA Draft | NBA Countdown” but I think I’m the only who will remember it and that’s only because I’m flapping my arms and squawking not because there was anything bad per se, but because there was nothing really good, either.

First of all, I’m not sure why it matters if Banchero thinks he should be the number one overall pick. He’s not going to be making that decision. The team that holds the top draft pick — in this case Orlando — is. Here’s a much better question: “How important is it for you to be the number one overall pick?” This would actually give an idea of the stakes for Banchero. What does this actually mean to him? Asking him why he should go number one is asking Banchero to tell us how others should see him. Asking Banchero how important it would be go number one is asking him to tell us about his feelings, something that’s much more likely to produce an interesting answer.

The point here isn’t to question Greenberg’s overall competence because I don’t. He’s as versatile a host as there is in the game, and anyone else in the industry has something to learn from the way he teases ahead to content. What I want to point out not just how we fail to maximize opportunities to generate interesting content, but why. Interviews are a staple of the sports-media industry. We rely on these interviews as both primary content that will be consumed directly, and as the genesis for our own opinions and reaction yet for all that importance we spend very little time thinking about the kind of answer this question is likely to produce.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

The Client Just Said YES, Now What?

We should spend as much time on what we will do after the client says YES.



One of the most significant moments in radio sales is when the client agrees to your proposal and says YES. But, when they do say YES, do you know what’s next? We better have an answer!

We spend a lot of time getting ready for clients with research, spec spots (thank you, radio sales trainer Chris Lytle-go to 22:30), proposals, and meetings. All of our focus is on getting the client to say YES. We should spend as much time on what we will do after the client says YES. For example, getting newer sales reps to sell annual advertising contracts would be ideal for building a list. They would have less pressure, more job security, and could spend more time making the advertising work for their clients. But, since most newer reps don’t know the business yet, they don’t bite off more than they can chew and sell a package of the month.

When a client says yes to the weight loss promotion, it’s pretty clear how to write the ads, what the promos will say, etc. BUT, if a newer sales rep starts selling annual contracts to a direct local client who needs a resource, how will that work? Let’s make sure we paint the picture right upfront. More experienced reps know that they need to assume the client will say YES to the weight loss promo and have a plan accordingly.

They have the next steps to building copy and promos, a credit app or credit card payment form, and any other detail the client must provide. But, when we ask a direct local client for an annual advertising contract, watch out! You have just made a partnership. Why not lay out, upfront, what that will look like. And I understand not every local client needs the same level of service.

A car dealer has the factories pushing quarterly promotions, agencies producing ads, and in-house marketing directors pulling it all together sometimes. Other clients need your help in promotions, copywriting, or idea generation. Make a plan upfront with your client about when you will meet to discuss the next quarter’s ad program. Include your station’s promotions or inventory for football and basketball season, a summer NTR event, digital testimonials with on-air talent, etc., in your annual proposal. Go out as far as you can and show what you have to offer to the client and how you can execute it. This exercise is good for you and, once mastered, guides the client on how you will take care of them after the sale. It also opens your eyes to what it takes to have a successful client partnership inside and outside the station.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Media Noise – Episode 74



This week, Demetri is joined by Ian Casselberry and Ryan Brown. Demetri talks about the NBA Draft getting an ABC simulcast, Ian talks about Patrick Beverley’s breakout week on TV, and Ryan reminds us that Tom Brady may be the star, but Kevin Burkhardt is the story we shouldn’t forget.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 Barrett Media.