With the NFL’s release of its 2020 schedule, we are optimistic that a season will follow along with it, meaning a kickoff to the season on September 10 and a Super Bowl on February 7, 2021. But circle one date in your calendar, Monday September 14.
Why? It’s the debut of Monday Night Football for the season and it’s anyone’s guess who might be manning (no it won’t be him) the booth that night.
The Monday Night Football broadcast is lost and is trying to find its way back into football fans’ hearts. Currently Joe Tessitore and Booger McFarland are the team and it’s just not working. Neither have been told that the plug is being pulled on them, but from everything out there in various media reports, they won’t be back. Nothing against those guys personally, but the booth needs a retooling. The chemistry isn’t there.
What used to be appointment watching has now become a disappointment to watch. The glory days of ABC’s early telecasts are gone. The uniqueness of those booths can’t be replicated and the times have just changed frankly and maybe nobody should try to duplicate what worked then.
The formula was simple. Frank Gifford, the former New York Giants star, was the play-by-play voice, taking over for the original guy, Keith Jackson. Gifford had a likeable quality and was a familiar face in a large media market in New York. “Dandy” Don Meredith, another former player, was the “class clown” with his endearing Southern drawl and “Turn out the lights…” song to end a game. Gifford and Meredith were great, but the star was Howard Cosell. The brash, unapologetic, tell it like it was and never at a loss for words, Cosell was must watch television. Cosell had always been a bit contemptuous when it came to ex-jocks in the booth and here he was, working with two of them. He and Meredith would clash often, but it worked.
Over the years, ABC tried to duplicate the formula a couple of times. When Al Michaels took over the play-by-play duties, the network shifted Gifford to analyst along with Dan Dierdorf. It was a few years later when the folks at ABC thought, let’s bring in a comedian Dennis Miller to work with Michaels and Dan Fouts. That experiment didn’t last very long. When the telecasts moved to ESPN, that network looked to recapture something from the glory days as well, by hiring Tony Kornheiser as an analyst along with Joe Theismann. That lasted a short time too. It’s hard to replicate something that was really a once in a lifetime thing. I understand why the choice was made though.
Monday Night Football in the 70’s was on one of 3 major networks at the time. Now, ESPN is one of hundreds of TV options along with streaming services fighting for viewership. It’s a much different landscape, so why not adapt to that, instead of going backwards? Move forward. The broadcast could use a shakeup. It may even be time to look outside the box a bit if I’m ESPN. I’m not the network, I don’t work for them, but if I did, here would be my list of candidates and a case made for each.
I’m going to break down who should at least be considered for the new booth. I’ll break it down into categories, those internal candidates already at ESPN, some that are outside the network and a couple that are outside the box. Here we go.
Internal candidates: Dave Pasch, Bob Wischusen and Steve Levy
Pasch is a fixture on the network and is well versed in basketball and football. He has been the radio voice of the Arizona Cardinals since 2002, so the NFL experience is definitely there. Pasch is a proven commodity with the network and has the ability to work with a number of different color analysts. He works well with all of them, deferring when needed to create credibility. He would be a great choice.
Wischusen is also an NFL broadcaster already. He has been the play-by-play voice of the Jets since 2002. Wischusen has been at ESPN in a variety of roles since 2006, where he’s called college football and basketball. A graduate of Boston College he had a couple of classmates with ESPN ties, including the incumbent voice of MNF, Tessitore and ESPN baseball play-by-play guy Jon Sciambi. Wischusen wouldn’t be a flashy choice, but a solid one nonetheless.
Levy has been a mainstay in Bristol having been with ESPN since 1993. He’s probably best known for his SportsCenter anchoring and NHL play-by-play than anything else. Recently though, he’s called College Football again for the network. Levy did call one MNF game last year. It was the second game of the Monday night doubleheader. Levy called it with Brian Griese.
My personal pick from this group would be Pasch.
Internal candidates: Brian Griese, Todd Blackledge, Pat McAfee, Louis Riddick and Jesse Palmer
Of this group, all have played in the NFL, so they all have credibility. Palmer has been around the longest of the group, but he seems to be concentrating more on hosting both in and out of sports.
Griese has the pedigree and that easy-going demeanor that goes over well with audiences.
Blackledge has the knowledge for sure, but is he a primetime performer under the scrutiny of MNF?
Riddick was a star on this year’s coverage of the NFL draft. His insight and knowledge as a player and personnel director make him a qualified candidate. I think I’d rather see him where he is, as a studio contributor.
McAfee is the new kid on the block, filled with energy and opinions. He’s become a big part of ESPN and actually, reportedly auditioned for the MNF booth when Jason Witten returned to play. While he’s a bit of a wildcard, McAfee is very entertaining (he did some work for the WWE) and does know his stuff.
From this group, McAfee is my choice, hands down.
Outside play-by-play: Kevin Harlan and Kevin Burkhardt
Harlan is such a great announcer, with a personality that matches. Harlan is part of the Westwood One coverage of MNF, so he’s already traveling to the sites for the games, why not just say, “Kevin, we need you in the TV booth”? He is the kind of person that can seemingly work with anyone and make the analyst look and sound great. Harlan is valuable to CBS, covering the NFL on Sunday’s and also working on their NCAA Tournament broadcasts.
Burkhardt is a great story, one of perseverance. Waiting for his break, he left the business for a time to sell cars. He knew the day would come and break after break came his way and now, he spends his Summer anchoring FOX Sports coverage of Major League Baseball. His Fall is split between MLB Playoffs and the number two announce team for FOX’s NFL coverage. He’s qualified for sure to take over the MNF booth. I enjoy his easy-going style, never upstaging the game, just calling what he sees. I am a fan.
My vote from this group of Kevins, is Burkhardt. It would be nice for him to be considered and get it.
Outside analyst: Daniel Jeremiah, Steve Mariucci, Nate Burleson and Tony Gonzalez
I’m more impressed every time I see Jeremiah on the air. He has a quiet confidence about him and the information is always good. Jeremiah’s on-air presence is very good and he is concise but informative. In other words, he’s not just talking to hear the sound of his own voice.
Mariucci is the old guard, the coach, the storyteller and a guy you’d like to sit and have a beer with. I’m not sure that the grind of the prep and travel would be something he’d want to do.
Burleson has great credibility as a former player. For a relative newcomer to the field, he handles himself very well on the air. He’s affable and can have a laugh at his own expense on the air. Burleson is pretty plugged in and well versed in the goings on in the NFL today.
Of this group, my pick without much hesitation is Jeremiah. I’d love to see him on the broadcast of MNF.
Outside the Box play-by-play: Gus Johnson
Could you just imagine Gus Johnson in primetime once a week? Don’t laugh too hard, because I think it could work. Johnson’s reputation for making a routine play sound like the most exciting one ever is appealing to a younger crowd. Isn’t that what ESPN is looking for? The 25-54’s eat this stuff up. Johnson would give some fans a reason to tune in, without a dog in the fight or if the game is terrible.
Outside the Box analyst: Rotating analysts
Would ESPN make a move and say, ok, we’ll have a play-by-play announcer, a permanent analyst and a rotating group of “other” analysts? Maybe this is where a Greg Olsen could fit in late in a season. Tony Gonzalez? Michael Strahan (not that he’d have any time with his 2000 jobs!) for a game in New York? Bill Walton? Ok maybe that last one is a stretch, but who knows. This broadcast needs something to pep it up and make it watchable no matter the way the game is going.
So, I’ve picked favorites from each of my categories, but there can only be three in the booth. For the sake of this column, I’ve been given sole power to select the new MNF booth and money is not an object.
From the start of this column, I knew who I’d be going with. Though, some of my own blurbs made me rethink a few times. But in the end, I stuck to my guns. Ladies and Gentlemen, the new MNF booth as chosen by me:
Play-by-play: Kevin Burkhardt
Analyst: Daniel Jeremiah
Analyst: Pat McAfee (rotating group came in 2nd in this one)
I think it’s a solid booth. Burkhardt knows how to use his analysts and delivers solid calls. He’s a pro’s pro. Jeremiah is climbing up that ladder as a respected evaluator of talent and has a ton of football knowledge. With Jeremiah concentrating on the serious, McAfee would be the entertainer and guy that makes outlandish observations and statements, but can back it up with some insight into the game, having played it for so long.
That’s my booth. It’s fresh, new and I think can work and work well.
Adam The Bull Is Giving Cleveland Something It’s Never Had Before
“It was only more recently that I was like why do I have to only be a radio guy?”
After spending 22 years on the radio, Adam “The Bull” Gerstenhaber was ready for a new adventure. In fact, the former co-host of Bull and Fox on 92.3 The Fan in Cleveland did not have a new job lined up when he signed off from his 11-year radio home last month.
“I was already leaving without having a new project,” admitted Gerstenhaber during a recent phone interview with BSM. “I left before I knew for sure I had a ‘next project’.”
Gerstenhaber was preparing for his final show with co-host Dustin Fox on April 1st when he was contacted by an executive producer for TEGNA, a company that was developing a Cleveland sports television show on YouTube. The executive producer, who had just found out that Bull was a free agent, made it clear that he wanted Bull to be a part of the new project.
It all came together very quickly.
“Let’s talk on Monday,” Gerstenhaber told the executive producer. “And within a week they signed me up.”
The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show on YouTube featuring Gerstenhaber, former ESPN personality Jay Crawford, 92.3 The Fan’s Garrett Bush, and rotating hosts to make up a four-person round-table show, made its debut last Monday. The show, which airs weekdays from 11am to 1pm, features passionate Cleveland sports talk, live guests, either in-studio or via Zoom, as well as interaction from the audience through social media.
“I’m very excited,” said Gerstenhaber. “It’s a definite adjustment for me after 22 years on radio doing television. For the last 11 years, I’ve been doing a radio show with just one other host and I was the lead guy doing most of the talking and now I’m on a show with three other people and it’s such an adjustment. So far, I’m having a ball.”
And so far, the reaction to the show has been very positive.
A big reason why is that it’s something that Cleveland didn’t have and really never had, unlike a city like New York, where there are local radio shows that are simulcast on regional sports channels.
“There’s nothing like that in Cleveland,” said Gerstenhaber. “And there was certainly nothing like this with a panel. Cleveland is such a massive sports town and now people that don’t live in Cleveland that are maybe retired in Florida or Arizona, now they actually have a TV show that they can watch that’s Cleveland-centric.”
The new venture certainly represents a big change in what Bull has been used to in his radio career. He’s enjoying the freedom of not having to follow a hard clock for this show. In fact, there have already been some occasions where the show has been able to go a little longer than scheduled because they have the flexibility to do that on YouTube.
Doing a show on YouTube gives the panel a great opportunity to go deep into topics and spend some quality time with guests. And while there is no cursing on the show at the moment, there could be the potential for that down the road.
Don’t expect the show is going to become X-rated or anything like that, but the objective is to be able to capture the spirit and emotion of being a sports fan and host.
“It’s something we may do in the future,” said Gerstenhaber. “Not curse just to curse but it gives us the option if we get fired up. It is allowed because there’s no restrictions there. The company doesn’t want us to do it at the moment.”
There’s also been the shift for Gerstenhaber from being the “point guard” on his old radio show, driving the conversation and doing most of the talking, to now taking a step back and having Crawford distributing the ball on the television show.
For a guy called “The Bull”, that will take some getting used to.
“Jay is a pro’s pro,” said Gerstenhaber. “He’s the point guard for this but he’s also part of the conversation. I’m not used to not being the point guard so I have to adjust to that. I think it’s gone pretty well and the chemistry is pretty good and with time we’ll get used to the flow of it.”
Gerstenhaber’s move from sports radio to an internet television show is a perfect example of how the industry is changing. A good portion of the listening and viewing audience these days, especially those in the younger demographic, are not necessarily watching traditional television or listening to terrestrial radio. For a lot of sports fans, watching and listening on a mobile device or a computer has become a very important way of life.
The desire to adapt, along with a shorter workday, was very enticing to him.
“It was only more recently that I was like why do I have to only be a radio guy?” wondered Gerstenhaber. “There were things about my job that I was unhappy about. I was doing a five-hour radio show. It’s too long. That’s crazy. Nobody should be doing a five-hour radio show at this point.”
Broadcasting on the internet has arrived and it’s not just a couple of sports fans doing a show from their garage anymore. The business has evolved to the point where the technology has provided more opportunities for those who have already enjoyed success in the industry and are looking for new challenges.
Kind of like Adam The Bull!
“I think years ago, probably like many people in the radio business, we looked at internet and podcasts as like whatever…those guys aren’t professionals…they’re amateurs,” said Gerstenhaber. “But the game has changed.”
Gerstenhaber, Crawford and everyone associated with the “Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show” should not have much of a problem attracting the younger audience. That demographic is already accustomed to watching shows on YouTube and other streaming platforms. The challenge now is to get the more mature audience on board. There are certainly some obstacles there.
I know this from experience with trying to explain to my mother in Florida how she can hear me on the radio and watch me on television simply by using her tablet.
Bull can certainly relate to that.
“My mother is still trying to figure out how to watch the show live,” said Gerstenhaber with a chuckle. “The older fans struggle with that. A lot of my older fans here in Cleveland are like how do I watch it? For people that are under 40 and certainly people that under 30, watching a YouTube show is like okay I watch everything on my phone or device. It’s such a divide and obviously as the years go by, that group will increase.”
With the television show off and running, Gerstenhaber still has a passion for his roots and that’s the radio side of the business. In the next couple of weeks, “The Bull” is set to announce the launch of two podcasts, one daily and one weekly, that will begin next month. But he also hasn’t ruled out the possibility of returning to terrestrial radio at some point.
“I have not closed the door to radio,” said Gerstenhaber. “I still love radio. I would still, in the right set of circumstances, consider going back to radio but it would have to really be the perfect situation. I’m excited about (the television show) and right now I don’t want to do anything else but I’m certainly going to remain open-minded to radio if a really excellent opportunity came up.”
The landscape of the broadcasting industry, particularly when it comes to sports, has certainly changed over the years and continues to evolve. Adam Gerstenhaber certainly enjoyed a tremendous amount of success on the radio side, both in New York and in Cleveland, but now he has made the transition to something new with the YouTube television show and he’s committed to making it a success.
Why You Should Be Making Great TikTok Content
“We’re specially trained in the world of TSL (time spent listening), and the longer people view your content on TikTok, the more the app rewards you by shoving your content into more and more feeds.”
It feels like there’s a new social media platform to pay attention to every other week. That makes it easy to overlook when one of them actually presents value to your brand. It wasn’t long ago that TikTok was primarily used by teenagers with the focus being silly dance trends filmed for video consumption with their friends and followers alike. Now, as the general public has become in tune with how this complicated app works, it’s grown far beyond that.
TikTok is now an app used by all types of demographics and unlike TikTok’s closely related cousins Instagram and Facebook, this app provides a certain type of nuance that I think people in our line of work can really excel in.
Before I get into the nuts and bolts of how you can use TikTok to your advantage and how to make your videos catch on, I think it’s important to first mention why this matters for you. Now, if I’m being realistic, I’m sure there are some that have already stopped reading this or those that could scroll away fast enough when they saw the words TikTok. You might be thinking that this doesn’t fit your demo, or maybe that it’s a waste of time because productivity here won’t directly lead to an uptick in Nielsen ratings. But I’m not sure any social network directly leads to what we ultimately get judged on, and we aren’t always pumping out content directly to our core audience.
TikTok, like any other app you may use, is marketing. This is another free tool to let people out there know who you are and what you offer in this endless sea of content. And the beauty of TikTok is that it directly caters its algorithm to content creators just like us. Bottom line, if you are a personality in sports talk, there’s no reason you can’t be crushing it on TikTok right now. All it takes is a little direction, focus, consistency, and a plan.
Unlike Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter where you can throw a photo up with a caption and be done for the day, TikTok’s whole model is built on creative videos that keep users engaged for longer periods of time. This approach works. According to Oberlo, a social media stat tracking site, people spend more time per day on TikTok than any other popular social media application. 38 minutes per day!
This is where this is good news for us in talk radio. We’re specially trained in the world of TSL (time spent listening), and the longer people view your content on TikTok, the more the app rewards you by shoving your content into more and more feeds. TikTok’s algorithm doesn’t care how many followers you have, your level of credibility, or the production on your video. All ir cares about is 1) Is your content good. and 2) Are people watching it. 3) How long are they watching it. The more people watch and the longer they watch creates a snowball effect. Your videos views will skyrocket, sometimes within hours.
So, how do you create content that will catch on? It’s really not all that different than what you do every day. Create thought-provoking commentary that makes people think, argue, or stay till the end to get the info you teased up for them. I’ve found through my own trial and error that it’s best if you stay away from time-sensitive material, I’ve had more success the more evergreen my content is. That way, the shelf life expands beyond just that day or week. This is different for everyone and there’s no one-size-fits-all, but this is where I’ve seen the most success.
Also, put yourself out there, don’t be afraid to say something that people are going to vehemently disagree with. Again, it’s not unlike what we do every day. It’s one thing to get someone to listen, it’s another to get them to engage. Once they hit you in the comment section, you’ve got them hooked. Comments breed more views and on and on. But don’t just let those sit there, even the smallest interaction back like a shoulder shrug emoji can go a long way in creating more play for your video.
If you want to grow quickly, create a niche for yourself. The best content creators that I follow on TikTok all put out very similar content for most of their videos. This means, unlike Instagram where it’s great to show what a wildly interesting and eclectic person you are, TikTok users want to know what they’re getting the second your face pops up on that screen. So if you are the sports history guy, be the sports history guy all the time. If you are the top 5 list guy, be the top 5 list guy all the time, and on and on, you get the point.
Other simple tricks:
- Splice small videos together. Don’t shoot one long video.
- 90 seconds to 2 minutes is a sweet spot amount of time.
- Add a soft layer of background instrumental music (this feature is found in the app when you are putting the finishing touches on your video)
- Label your video across the screen at the start and time it out so that it disappears seconds later. This way a user gets an idea of what the content is immediately and then can focus on you delivering your message thereafter.
- Research trending hashtags, they are far more important than whatever you caption your video.
- Use closed captions so that people can follow your video without sound.
Finally, don’t be intimidated by it or snub your nose at it. Anything that helps your brand is worth doing and anything worth doing is worth doing well.
Does Tom Brady’s Salary Make Sense For FOX In a Changing Media World?
“The risk here doesn’t have to do with Brady specifically, but rather the business of televising football games in general.”
FOX is playing it too safe when it comes to adding Tom Brady.
That’s going to sound weird given the size of Brady’s broadcasting contract. Even if that deal isn’t worth as much as initially reported, it’s a hell of a lot of loot, especially considering Brady has remained steadfastly uninteresting for a solid 20 years now.
Let’s not pretend that is a detriment in the eyes of a television network, however. There’s a long line of famous athletes companies like FOX have happily paid millions without ever requiring them to be much more than consistently inoffensive and occasionally insightful. Yes, Brady is getting more money than those previous guys, but he’s also the most successful quarterback in NFL history.
The risk here doesn’t have to do with Brady specifically, but rather the business of televising football games in general. More specifically, the fact that the business of televising football games is changing, and while it may not be changing quite as rapidly as the rest of the sports-media industry, but it is changing. There’s an increasing number of choices available to viewers not only in the games that can be watched, but how they are consumed. Everything in the industry points to an increasingly fragmented audience and yet by signing Brady to be in the broadcast booth once he retires, FOX is paying a premium for a single component in a tried-and-true broadcasting formula will be more successful.
Think of Brady’s hiring as a bet FOX made. A 10-year commitment in which it is doubling down on the status quo at a time of obvious change. FOX saw ESPN introduce the ManningCast last year, and instead of seeing the potential for a network to build different types of products, FOX decided, “Nah, we don’t want to do anything different or new.” Don’t let the price tag fool you. FOX went out and bought a really famous former player to put in a traditional broadcast booth to hope that the center holds..
Maybe it will. Maybe Brady is that interesting or he’s that famous and his presence is powerful enough to defy the trends within the industry. I’m not naive enough to think that value depends on the quality of someone’s content. The memoir of a former U.S. president will fetch a multi-million-dollar advance not because of the literary quality, but because of the size of the potential audience. It’s the same rationale behind FOX’s addition of Brady.
But don’t mistake an expensive addition from an innovative one. The ManningCast was an actual innovation. A totally different way of televising a football game, and while not everyone liked it, some people absolutely loved it. It’s not going to replace the regular Monday Night Football format, but it wasn’t supposed to. It’s an alternative or more likely a complement and ESPN was sufficiently encouraged to extend the ManningCast through 2024. It’s a different product. Another option it is offering its customers. You can choose to watch to the traditional broadcast format with Joe Buck and Troy Aikman in the booth or you can watch the Mannings or you can toggle between both. What’s FOX’s option for those audience members who prefer something like the ManningCast to the traditional broadcast?
It’s not just ESPN, either. Amazon offered viewers a choice of broadcasters, too, from a female announcing tandem of Hannah Storm and Andrea Kramer beginning in 2018 to the Scouts Feed with Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks in 2020.
So now, not only do viewers have an increasingly wide array of choices on which NFL games they can watch — thanks to Sunday Ticket — they in some instances have a choice of the announcing crew for that given game. Amid this economic environment, FOX not only decided that it was best to invest in a single product, but it decided to make that investment in a guy who had never done this particular job before nor shown much in the way of an aptitude for it.
Again, maybe Brady is the guy to pull it off. He’s certainly famous enough. His seven Super Bowl victories are unmatched and span two franchises, and while he’s denied most attempts to be anything approaching interesting in public over the past 20 years, perhaps that is changing. His increasingly amusing Twitter posts over the past 2 years could be a hint of the humor he’s going to bring to the broadcast booth. That Tampa Tom is his true personality, which remained under a gag order from the Sith Lord Bill Belichick, and now Brady will suddenly become football’s equivalent of Charles Barkley.
But that’s a hell of a needle to thread for anyone, even someone as famous as Brady, and it’s a really high bar for someone with no broadcasting experience. The upside for FOX is that its traditional approach holds. The downside, however, is that it is not only spending more money on a product with a declining market, but it is ignoring obvious trends within the industry as it does so.