Connect with us

BSM Writers

Forget The Last 5 Years, Mike Valenti Is Focused On The Next 5

“I’ve made mistakes in my career, but I pride myself on how fast I go and how hard I attack.”



It’s not easy to change when you’re already in first place, but it’s the best way to avoid complacency. If you’re not growing and evolving, the people behind you will until they reach the top.

The Mike Valenti Show is winning on 97.1 The Ticket in Detroit, but that didn’t stop the longtime afternoon host from vouching for his friend and colleague Rico Beard to join the show. Not only does Beard bring his sports talk prowess, but he adds perspective to a station that admits they’ve missed the mark in reflecting Detroit’s diversity.

Mike Valenti is not happy about 97.1 The Ticket breaking news early | News  Break

Valenti had a more than decade-long run The Ticket alongside Terry Foster and was equally successful as a solo host for the last four years. But even being in first place, Valenti believes the timing is right for change.

Brandon Contes: As successful as your show already is, why did you want to add a co-host?

Mike Valenti: It gets skipped in the headlines, but we lost an incredibly valuable part of the show in Mike Sullivan, because he’s not your regular producer. I’m a big believer in the Howard Stern model of using multiple voices. And when Terry [Foster] retired, we didn’t want to rush putting someone in that chair. It would be disrespectful to the 13-year run we had. We created characters, David Hull “Hatchet Man,” Roberto and Mike.

Mike is an unbelievable producer, he’s really good on-air, he also had several clients on annual deals. So I have to replace the position, the on-air aspect and the revenue. I’ve been interested in Rico for a long time. It’s no secret that I’m friends with him, I’ve tried to get him hired at the station for years, and now the timing is right.

“When Mike called me about joining him at 97.1, I thought it was the setup to a joke,” Beard said. “I was shocked, Mike doesn’t need help, he’s got the number one show. But the statement that sold me was when he said ‘we always talk about coaches that lose their edge because they won’t evolve.’ Mike wants to evolve, he hasn’t had a co-host in four years. He’s going to push me, I’m going to push him, we’re going to get the best out of each other and take this show to a new level.”

“I’ve had Rico on the radar for quite some time, but we didn’t have the right opportunity available,” Brand Manager of The Ticket Jimmy Powers added. “Mike Sullivan’s departure created an opening that allowed us to bring Rico on board.  Sullivan was a valuable contributor to the show who will be greatly missed, but I couldn’t be more excited to hear what Rico will bring. Rico is the perfect fit to step in and provide his bold opinions and perspective, which will be different than Mike’s.”

BC: Did you recognize the importance of creating more diversity on the radio station’s lineup so that when you look at the name and faces of each show it’s not just mostly white males across the board?

MV: That’s not lost on anybody, and to be fair, it’s an industry issue. I’m not going to put other stations on blast, but go over the roster on a lot of stations and it’s a problem. It’s great to be part of positive change, but bottom line, we’ve had our eye on Rico for a long time. Am I happy I’m the one to have Rico join my show? Of course, but now it’s about winning. We’re already number one, let’s win by more. Let’s not look at what we’ve done the last five years, let’s program for the next five.

“You want to see and hear from people who look like you,” Beard added. “Throughout the country, radio stations should reflect the community. Stations should open up to new experiences, hear different stories and ways. By doing that, radio can do what a lot of politicians can’t do and bridge the gap between cultures. When you listen to radio, you hear another person’s life and experience, maybe you can now sympathize and empathize with that person. The power of radio can be tremendous.”

BC: Is Detroit a passionate sports fanbase? From the outside looking in, I’ve never viewed the city like I do Boston, Philly or New York.

MV: Everybody knows I’m from back east and I’ve always had an affinity for New York City, those are my teams. But I’ve always said this is one of the five best sports cities in America. Chicago, Detroit, New York, Boston and Philly. I’ve been blessed to have a long, great career here and people always ask, ‘how come you haven’t left to do something else?’ I already have one of the five jobs, I really believe that.

We have four pro teams, plus Michigan and Michigan State. We’re not New York, but we’re on par from a content standpoint. Even with our teams being awful, the passion is there. It’s a cold weather city and the winter means you’re watching TV. If you’re watching TV, you’re watching sports.

BC: How have you done without sports the last few months and more importantly, how would your audience say you’ve done? When sports shut down, there were a lot of hosts saying, ‘this is a chance to be creative’ and ‘this will separate the great hosts,’ but four months later, would your listeners say you delivered?

MV: I think you’re seeing a lot of the industry get exposed. Sports stations and talent got comfortable with being a ‘sports guy’ and operating in that box. But that’s not really where radio needs to go, it’s not where content needs to go. Our job was never to just beat the other sports station. Our expectation is to beat everybody.

I’ve enjoyed this. Are there days I pull my hair out and say this is a little harder? Sure, but most days, I’m proud of our content and the fact that we have a dozen different things on our show sheet. I’m also different, I’m not afraid to get into non-sports conversations. I say the things I feel and back it up with rational thought and facts.

I’ve never been prouder of a particular ratings book than the one we just had. 89 days, not a single game, we’re still number one. Obviously I want sports back, but it’s been awakening to show people I can do a lot more than what you think I can do.

“When I was his PD and hired him, he was raw,” said Kevin Graham, Valenti’s first program director at The Ticket. “He was a sports guy who grew up listening to the WFAN model which is X’s and O’s sports. But he’s evolved over the years as his comfort level increased and ratings went up and he’s been encouraged by other PD’s to go outside the sports bubble, so I’m not surprised he’s continued to be successful during the pandemic.”

BC: Does national radio appeal to you? There’s more freedom to build a show whereas local you’re obligated to talk Tigers all summer.

MV: Last summer I may have talked Tigers four or five times, they were irrelevant in my world. If your teams are that bad, you can’t talk about them every day, so I operate as a national show. The national platform used to appeal more, but I think you’re seeing a shift where the national platform doesn’t have the cache it used to have. All of my content is available to everyone everywhere through RADIO.COM and different platforms.

There’s no way to replace local. If you want to hear about your teams or a familiar voice, this is the place that does it and each city has that place. For national, I’d have to be presented with an opportunity I haven’t seen yet, I would never say never, but it doesn’t get the juices going like it used to.

BC: How strong was the WFAN appeal when you did test shows with Evan Roberts and Chris Simms in 2017 while they looked for Francesa’s replacement?

MV: As strong as it can be. It’s a dream job! That was my dream growing up and it doesn’t always work out. We started talking about what things would look like and it just wasn’t a fit. I’ve built a hell of a business, a hell of a career here in Detroit and I value my listeners and this station. It’s going to take a lot to pull you away from that. I’m not 25 anymore. You lose some of those dreams where you used to think you would walk on hot coals to get that job. It has to be right for me, for my wife and for my career. But with WFAN, I would never have gotten on the plane if it wasn’t serious.

“I couldn’t have been happier for Mike!” Powers said, “WFAN is a station he grew up listening to, so I know it’s been near and dear to him for a long time. I am a big fan of people pursuing their dreams and am an advocate for people going after life changing opportunities and fulfilling their professional goals.”

BC: What’s your mindset when with a new co-host? Do you tone down your intensity? Or are you yourself and if they can’t keep up that’s on them?

MV: A lot of conversations have to go into it before you hit the button to go on-air. Whether it was with Evan or Chris, there were a ton of phone calls between us. But you have to be a version of who you are, otherwise  you’re really not helping yourself or the person you’re doing the show with.

Part of the fun of building a new show is being able to bring different things out of your co-host. That’s what talent’s supposed to do, and I take pride in that. I’m excited to have that opportunity now with Rico. It’s like unwrapping a present, let’s go on this journey and see what we can come up with.

BC: I never listened to you before you did those shows on WFAN in 2017. I enjoy Evan Roberts as a host, but when he was with you, it sounded like he was trying to keep up. Your brand of radio is different and it was intense for July radio where the homerun derby is usually the biggest sporting event.

MV: [Laughs] Or whether the Yankees should trade for Lucas Duda.

I can’t speak for Evan and how he felt about it, but all eyes were on him when he had random pairings coming in there. What you heard is my general approach, when you look at the PPM world we live in, you only get so many minutes from a person in a week. If you’re not passionate, find something else to do, if you’re not going to bring energy, find something else to do. I take great pride in that and it also requires an ample amount of coffee.

BC: Do you ever listen back to your famous 2006 MSU rant?

MV: I’ve listened back a couple times in 15 years. But for me, I feel like I’ve done so much that is far superior to that. It makes you laugh that choking on applesauce is what you’re remembered for.

I think that rant resonated with people because whether you were a Lions fan, Spartans fan, Texas A&M, any team who just couldn’t get it done, you can relate. That rant was 20 years in the making. I came in the Monday after that game against Notre Dame and my producer attempted to talk to me about the show. I said I’ll handle it on-air. I didn’t even talk to Terry.

The funny part is people who think a rant like that is even possible to be scripted. I put bullet points on my show sheet, there are no index cards, binders or written out takes. It’s an asinine way to think guys can do this. Just go, just speak and the rest takes care of itself. 

BC: With that ‘just go, just speak’ approach, is there concern for crossing a line? I know you’re not on social media, but there are people listening that are on Twitter and they’re on Reddit waiting for someone to say something they can attack.

MV: ‘Just speak,’ but you have to have your career flash before your eyes when you’re doing this job. I pride myself on the uncomfortable conversations, but you must always be keenly aware. I’m not concerned with things that are considered unpopular or people disagreeing, but we have to be mindful as human beings not to be hurtful, not to cross the line.

It’s a challenge, no one’s perfect and when you color near the lines, you may go outside the edge. I’ve made mistakes in my career, but I pride myself on how fast I go and how hard I attack. I like to think, my listeners would say ‘hey, he’s pretty damn mindful.’

You mentioned social media. Part of the reason I got rid of it in 2013 is that it’s just noise. It takes away from the artform. We could do a whole separate interview on the damage social media has done to this country. If I ran a station, I swear I would just have producers on social media, I would forbid it for my hosts. Just lock in and do the job. Guys are too damn concerned with thumbs up, likes, hearts and getting something from total strangers who might not even listen to the show. One of the best things I ever did was getting rid of all that garbage.

BC: You mentioned the damage social media has done to this country. With your personality and intense brand of radio, if you were 18 years old today in 2020 and you’ve seen social media ruin careers, would it deter you from entering the business?

MV: Truthfully, I have the worst personality in the world for this job off-air and I’ve got the best personality for it on-air. Off-air, I’m laid back, I don’t need attention or want the spotlight. It’s tough for me to go back to 18 because nothing was going to stop me. I never wanted to write for a magazine, I had no desire to be on TV. This is the only job I wanted and it goes back to the summer driving around with my dad, listening to FAN through static in Albany. So I’d like to think the noise wouldn’t have deterred me.

BC: From a host’s perspective, how does the station having rights partnerships with a pro team impact your show?

MV: No one is ever going to deny that when a team is chasing a championship it’s going to help your numbers. But I don’t think rights are nearly as important as they used to be. You have entire networks whose purpose is to make that content available, dice it up, put it out, and get hits on social.

The most dishonest thing out there are teams with their own websites hiring their own writers. It’s propaganda, not journalism. Teams would be better served by not caring what people say about them. Just win games. Win games and your problems go away. Instead, these teams would rather call a program director or host and complain about a random segment from the middle of July. Do me a favor, don’t lose eight out of 10. Just win!

BC: When the Lions left 97.1, how did it feel to have the support of the radio station and know they weren’t going to let a team censor you?

MV: It was fine by me. I couldn’t stand the team. They had some really unprofessional people working there. They have no clue. You have one playoff win since 1957, but I’m your problem?

I tried to play the game. I tried to broker a relationship. I tried to do the things you’re “supposed to do” in this business. And the minute you say something they don’t like, everything else is washed down the toilet. They’d complain if I wasn’t at practice. Why? So I can see people stretch? Get the hell out of here.

I think the future model is the Barstool mentality. We don’t need access to give you the content you want. People don’t care about game stories anymore. People want to talk about what they watched and what their feelings are. It’s my job to translate what some of the numbers mean and maybe why you’re feeling that way is or isn’t correct. The industry needs to move on from that classic egomaniac radio guy who says ‘I was in the room last night.’ Nobody cares buddy, this isn’t 1985.

“Mike and I have always differed on this, he thinks I’m wasting my time, but I like going to games and hearing from coaches and players,” said Beard. “I was taught that by the late great Drew Sharp – if you say something about a player or coach, it’s your responsibility to show up at the next game or press conference. I like to hear what happened because sometimes there might be a reason, a player can pull you aside and off the record tell you something they’re going through that will explain their performance.”

BC: Do you feel added pressure with Rico joining the show? You have a top-rated show and you vouched for him, but if ratings drop, the finger gets pointed at him just because he’s the new addition.

MV: I disagree with that. I think the target will always be on me. I don’t make any secret about it, I advocated for this move. If you buy the groceries and dinner doesn’t turn out well, it’s your fault. I’m so conditioned to the pressure of it all, I’m used to it. My biggest concern is you have to have a very honest conversation with whoever you do radio with. But specifically, if you have a relationship with that person, playtime is over. This is a business and if it doesn’t work out, we have to be adults about it.

He’s someone I care about immensely. He’s tight with me and my family, we genuinely like each other. You don’t want to see that go south, but sometimes, that’s the risk of it all. There’s always a chance that it doesn’t end well. Everybody in this game is hired to be fired, at some point the music will stop and my goal is to get out before they stop the music on me. But I like to think I know something about radio after all these years. A lot of people are going to be surprised by us because they haven’t been exposed to Rico. I like to think I’m pretty damn good at bringing out the best in people and I have confidence this will work.

“There’s more pressure joining a show that’s already established,” said Beard. “On a new show, you’re allowed mistakes, but joining a show that’s already number one, there’s nowhere to go but down. I told Mike I want this to be like the Warriors adding Kevin Durant. They didn’t need Durant, but he took them to a new level where it was unfair for the rest of the NBA. I’m not coming to this show to be Mike’s sidekick and his cheerleader, I’m coming to this show because I have my own opinions, thoughts and life experiences. I’m from southwest Detroit, I know this city, I know the fans’ passion and frustrations.”

BSM Writers

ESPN Can’t Be ESPN Without Football

“You know the saying “scared money don’t make money?” Well, ESPN knows that smart money can eliminate the need for scared money entirely.”



I saw a Tweet on Monday, just after Texas and Oklahoma made their impending exit from the Big 12 official, that interested me. Athlon’s Bryan Fischer asked how the recent investment in college football ESPN has made would affect its ability to lure more properties to the network.

Much has been made of the American television rights to the Premier League hitting the open market. ESPN, Amazon and DAZN have all expressed interest, while NBC has made it clear that it does not intend to let Britain’s top soccer league go anywhere else. All of that points to a major bidding war on the horizon.

ESPN has invested a lot in soccer recently, particularly at ESPN+. The company has the American media rights to top leagues in 9 different countries, including Spain’s La Liga and Germany’s Bundesliga, which are both full of international stars. It also has MLS games and major national and club tournaments from Europe. Whenever that day gets here where soccer overtakes hockey and then baseball as America’s third most popular sport, ESPN is in good position.

That is kind of the point here. ESPN does a lot of betting on the future. The major investment in college football is about cashing in right now. Younger American generations really like soccer and follow it in a variety of ways. The generation with money to spend right now loves football and they are going to consume it wherever they need to.

ESPN will pony up the money to expand the College Football Playoff. It will get behind Texas & Oklahoma moving to the SEC, where it is already heavily invested. It will open up the checkbook and tell the NFL “just name the amount” in order to get a Super Bowl.

You know the saying “scared money don’t make money?” Well, ESPN knows that smart money can eliminate the need for scared money entirely.

History is on ESPN’s side when you talk about taking risks. The network has bet big and seen it payoff. It rode college basketball to national relevance in a time when that sport was a blip on most people’s radars. More recently, it got in on the World Series of Poker at the right time and pulled back when it needed to.

If ESPN views the Premier League as a necessity for its future, it isn’t hard to imagine it will have any trouble finding the necessary money. But the network knows that football, both college and the NFL, are not leaving the top of the American sports hierarchy any time soon. The goal isn’t just to have football. It is to have the very best football.

So, it does what it needs to in order to become a part of the Super Bowl rotation. It commits the resources to expanding the College Football Playoff. And right now, as the SEC is busy not just winning the college football arms race, but obliterating anyone in its path, ESPN is committing what it needs to to make its top college sports property a juggernaut.

Conservative pundits love to make a big deal of ESPN subscription numbers, pretending not to know that no one subscribes individually to cable channels. But look at the money being thrown around. Clearly Disney thinks the network is doing just fine and is worth investing in. For better or worse, it shapes most of the national sports conversation.

If Norby Williamson and Jimmy Pitaro think that conversation will include more Premier League talk in the future, they will find the money to spend. And when they find it, they will thank the SEC and the NFL for taking the network’s money and turning it into more money.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Are Media Days Good For Content Or Just Good For Networking?

“There is an ego boost for hosts attending these events and holding court with colleagues from across the country, but how does that help the people that are coming to you to be entertained before having to clock into a job they hate?”



Last week, most major college football conferences put on an event. They gathered the coaches from every team and invited media members from across the country to attend. Media Days used to really matter in college football. In 2021, I found myself skimming a lot of stations broadcasting live from Birmingham or Charlotte or Indianapolis and wondering “who even cares about this awful content?”.

Media Days are only slightly better than radio row at the Super Bowl. No one is trying to get you to put a long-retired kicker on the air for five minutes to talk about boner pills, but I am not sure a stream of coaches and players, who have spent the better part of the previous month practicing saying nothing, is that much better.

2021 SEC Media Days takeaways: Nick Saban takes center stage, coaches  advocate for CFP expansion -
Courtesy: Icon Sportswire

I get that there is value in these gatherings. This is usually the first chance to ask coaches the questions the media has been making content out of for the entire summer. It is a chance to reconnect with colleagues in other markets and compare some notes. They can be a lot of fun sometimes for the people in attendance. I am just not sure if the payoff is there for the listeners and so I am not sure that every station really can justify going.

There are plenty of stations to do these events right. 1010XL in Jacksonville sent two hosts to Birmingham for SEC Media Days. They were at their table all day. The hosts back in the studio in Florida would throw to them live whenever a coach worth putting on air was in the vicinity. There were no all day broadcasts and that meant no filler content. All that went on the air was the content that you had to be in Birmingham to get. 107.5 The Game in Columbia, SC did something very similar, with Heath Cline being the only host there and creating smaller, more impactful content for the whole station.

For some markets, these events matter a lot. Birmingham is the single most college football obsessed market in America. JOX 94.5 probably made the right decision by being in the Wynfrey Hotel hallways all day for all four days of the event. Of course, it helps that the station has a new morning show hosted by two ESPN employees with relationships with most if not all of the conference’s coaches. Raleigh, where I live now, is the home radio market for three ACC teams. It makes sense 99.9 The Fan sent two shows to be in Charlotte for both days of the conference’s media event.

Still though, there are plenty of questions hosts at those stations and at stations in similar markets have to ask themselves. Is there anything we can get by going there that we cannot get year round? Does our audience like the sport? Does it like the conference? Or is it maybe just passionate about the home team(s)? If the answer is the latter – and I genuinely think that is the case in Raleigh, why waste the money getting the same interviews you can get for free during the season? You know, that time when there is actually something happening worth talking about.

Look, I’ve been a host and a producer. I get the appeal of these events and I understand that being live and sitting down with names like Dabo and Saban make the station sound bigger. There is some value in attending these media days.

Courtesy: Dan Matthew

But value to us as broadcasters and value to the audience are different things. We talk about “outside the box thinking” and “thinking like a listener” constantly. This is one of those issues where the value to the audience is the only value that matters really.

Programmers need to approach events like these with a plan. The same can really be said for any radio row. Do you send staff to do three or four hour long live shows for multiple days? Do you send your morning show to broadcast live but stick around to record interviews later in the day so that you can decide what is relevant before airing it?

One part of the programmer’s job description that isn’t often named is “listener advocate.” He or she has think outside the box while living inside of it. There is an ego boost for hosts attending these events and holding court with colleagues from across the country, but how does that help the people that are coming to you to be entertained before having to clock into a job they hate?

I can hear the pushback right now. “Demetri, do you know how much money we make from companies that want to sponsor our broadcasts from media days?”

I am sure the amount is high, but I am also positive that one broadcast or one week long events not the only reason they spend money with you. Also, I am not telling you that there is absolutely zero reason to attend these events. I am just asking you to evaluate how good the content that comes from them actually is.

Big Ten Media Days: Warren talks conference realignment; has 'no regrets'  about how Big Ten handled '20 season | Football |
Courtesy: Doug Mcschooler/The Associated Press

There was actually an interesting story that broke in the middle of SEC Media Days, with news that Texas and Oklahoma are aggressively pursuing membership in the conference. But did that lead to any real news from the coaches in Birmingham? Not really. They all answered with platitudes and deferrals whenever they were asked about what a 16-team SEC would mean for the rest of college sports. I think most stations would have been just as well served to pull that audio off of

College football is my favorite sport in the world. I love when we all get together, both at actual conventions and various radio rows that serve as pseudo-conventions. I understand and actually like media days. I just think it is important to consider whether or not there are enough people in your market that cannot live without hearing your hosts talk to Shane Beamer. If you are anywhere but Columbia, South Carolina, I am virtually positive the answer is no.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

The Wins And Losses Of Gambling Twitter

“The great part of Gambling Twitter is that it’s open to everyone and anybody can prove themselves.”



Let’s face it. Twitter has changed the way we do a lot of things. For some, it’s replaced the daily newspapers. For others, it’s a means of communicating with an audience. Regardless of the way you utilize Twitter, no one can deny its impact.

In the sports world in particular, Twitter can be an interesting space. It’s a place where you can collectively live through an experience like watching a big game or reacting to news. It’s also a place where opinions can be shared and “liked” and of course, disliked. So, what happens when an open social media platform collides with the booming business of legalized sports betting? Gambling Twitter. 

Gambling Twitter is an interesting term. It can describe many things. You could be talking about #GamblingTwitter, where someone likely uses the Hashtag to promote their picks or attract an audience, or you could simply be referring to the community of people on Twitter, who talk about Gambling. I prefer the latter. And Gambling Twitter can be a great place. 

James Alberino, who runs @SpreadInvestor says the communal aspect, as well as the opportunity it provides, is what makes Gambling Twitter special.

“The great part of Gambling Twitter is that it’s open to everyone and anybody can prove themselves. If you’re good and know how to market yourself (or work for a company that’s good at marketing) you’ll grow a following and network with some great people along the way. There’s also nowhere better to be online during a game when you have a bet than on Twitter. The reactions and humor are some of the best live entertainment that you can get. There are a lot of smart people on here and when they work together, they help each other’s careers/businesses. It’s like one big virtual office where a lot of people in the industry can talk to one another whenever they want and collaborate on work.”

James Alberino (@jamesalberino) | Twitter

Using Gambling Twitter to help promote your career is something Pamela Maldonado (@pamelam35), Yahoo SportsBook Betting Analyst, feels strongly about from personal experience. 

“Twitter being beneficial is an understatement,” she told me. “I started posting picks/analysis back in 2016 as a hobby when I was waist deep in the poker world. Looking back now, that was my resume and I was working on getting to where I am now unknowingly. I also have a background in social media marketing so I am very aware of the need to engage with users. I take the time to talk to everyone and respond to every DM. I love Twitter. It connects the world. It’s given me a space to talk about the things that are important to me. 2020, that was the political climate, in 2021, it’s Novak Djokovic and tennis.”

But not every experience is positive. 

Alberino says “It can be very cutthroat especially among guys who have been in the space for a long time. There is a lot of money in this industry and everyone in it is trying to get a piece of the pie in the form of either money or media attention. There are a lot of scammers who do not care about their followers other than the dollar signs and a ton of people have bad tastes in their mouths from it. They take that baggage with them a lot of times when they do business with other cappers. Then there are the casual gamblers in the audience who think they know more than they do about betting. The scamming and ignorance has been going on forever though, it’s not just a Twitter thing. But Twitter gives these guys no barrier to entry and an open platform. A portion of broadcasters and pro bettors have figured out ways to work together but for the most part there’s a divide between “touts” and people on the media side of the industry, for understandable reasons. Some handicappers act like complete jackasses. And some media people are very good with a mic but not as much at betting. So you have two worlds colliding and some people stepping out of bounds to either gain followers or make more money.”

James is right. Everyone is trying to grab a piece of the pie. Each Sportsbook utilizes Twitter to promote itself. But are they doing it from a genuine place? How many times have you seen a Sportsbook account tweet out a winning long shot parlay? Countless times a day right? The reality of the matter is that these winning bets are extremely rare, however by tweeting and retweeting them, they hope to make the casual better feel as if they could be next. When, in reality, they just want customers to place these losing wagers so they can make money. That’s their business model. 

Another negative aspect is the feedback. Some would say, “if you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen”, and they’re probably right. If you publicly make a bet, you’re opening yourself to negative reaction when that bet loses. Does that always happen? 

“I’ve been fortunate to not experience any type of negativity, but I think it’s because of the way I present myself,” Maldonado says. “I never just give picks. I give a thorough reason. I post my record, I answer questions, and I try my best to differentiate what is ‘content’ and what is an actual bet. How I do that: by posting, “I am playing.” It’s fair to say that I’ve been more right, than I have been wrong, so I believe that I’ve created a loyal following of those who trust me and stand by me, even during a downswing. Has there been a change over the years? I can’t say for sure. I think I can count on one hand the number of people I have blocked and that’s because I’ve been on Twitter for a very long time. It’s a very short list of negative experiences, so far, and I think that mostly comes from me knowing my audience, knowing how to communicate, and knowing how to handle the bad days of betting – and that’s by acknowledging them, not ignoring them.”

Pamela Maldonado on Twitter: "Life is too short to bet the Under. So I'm  taking the OVER on Boise/Ok St… "

But what about being a woman in this space? Is the experience different because its largely a male dominated audience? Ariel Epstein of SportsGrid (@ArielEpstein) shared her experience. 

“Overall, it’s positive. I love interacting with everyone through the wins and losses. It’s a lot of fun to enjoy the wins and I have to say most of my followers are very understanding of the losses. I’ve always prided myself on giving out so many reasons to take my bet, that if it does lose, someone says ‘wow I can’t believe that lost.’

“There are always a few trolls who will say things like ‘I remember when you always won,’ or ‘at least you’re pretty.’ I’ve been asked on dates via direct message many times before. I usually just don’t answer. My motto is always to engage with the good people and ignore the bad. It gets less traction for the trolls on Twitter if I just don’t respond. 

“I’ve always known I’d have to have thick skin as a female to make it in this business. The gambling side of things adds a whole new element because now you’re messing with people’s money. On the lighter side, I have been asked by many men if they could buy me a drink or send me money via Venmo because I won them bets. I find those types of things hilarious because I don’t know these people. I know it’s coming from a good place though. I do decline by the way.”

Ariel Epstein on Twitter: "Sportsbook Sunday stare down 👀… "

I think there’s an interesting case study to be done on Gambling Twitter because there are so many different aspects of it. You can talk about the handicappers, the analysts, the Sportsbooks and the audience. Each play their own role in the community.

I for one, love being a part of Gambling Twitter. Yes, I’ve had to mute a few trolls, but there’s nothing better than getting a tweet thanking you for the work you’ve done. I don’t post plays on Twitter to brag or claim victory over anyone. I post to help provide education to a larger audience craving information. If I can help people win a few bucks, that’s great. If it loses, then I take the heat. I understand the role I play. I walk a fine line because I am a member of the media, hosting several radio/tv shows, and a handicapper, because I pride myself on providing picks and analysis to the audience. Am I a social media guru? No. But I think there’s a place for me on Gambling Twitter, and I think there’s a place for you too. 

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 Barrett Media.