Connect with us

News Print & Digital

Washington Post Reiterates “Political Activism” Policies in Memo to Employees

The Daily Beast’s Max Tani was the first to report on the memo’s contents.

Eduardo Razo

Published

on

The Washington Post sent a memo to its newsroom employees, which Daily Beast reporter Max Tani shared on Twitter. The note from the newspaper is to remind the newsroom employees of its policy regarding employees participating in public political activism.

For newsroom employees, The Post’s policy allows them to attend celebrations and parades that promote “expressions of personal identity.” Employees can participate in events such as “Pride or Juneteenth celebrations, July 4th parades, heritage festivals, and other such non-political gatherings.”

However, context matters for The Post, as employees can partake in festivities “at BLM plaza but not a protest there or attend a Pride gathering but not a demonstration at the Supreme Court.”

“We should do everything possible to avoid partisanship or advocacy for specific policies or special interests, or the appearance of such activity,” the memo said.

Also, employees are discouraged from wearing a shirt that expresses public advocacy. Nonetheless, once this memo became public, it became a hot topic of discussion with various journalists on Twitter.

Wesley Lowery, a journalist at CBS News and formerly of The Post, is one of the more prominent media members to provide their thoughts in a thread on Twitter.

“I ask this with all sincerity: can someone explain to me the difference between a “celebration” at Black Lives Matter Plaza and a “protest” there?” Lowery tweeted. “How does an attendee ensure one does not become the other? Is the location itself not, definitionally, “political”?”

“Citing a “Pride” parade as an example of a non-political event seems an ahistorical stance for a newspaper to take. Would it be ok to wear a shirt declaring that the 600k residents of DC deserve full enfranchisement if the shirt stops short of specifically advocating statehood?”

News Print & Digital

Bill O’Reilly: ‘Unholy Alliance’ Between Liberal Media and Government Officials

A recent effort by citizens to recall Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon is O’Reilly’s point of contention.

Published

on

On Monday’s episode of The O’Reilly Update podcast, during the “message of the day” Bill O’Reilly focused on the ties between liberal media outlets and government officials.

“There are unholy alliances in play,” O’Reilly said. “That is press agencies advancing the fortunes of leftists seeking power, while at the same time ignoring injustice. Let’s focus on a very vivid example: the Los Angeles Times. Like its namesake in New York, the LA Times is a liberal outfit. Nothing wrong with that, if an attempt is made to provide straightforward news coverage. Unfortunately, that’s not what’s happening. While crime is devastating LA and other California cities, the newspaper is desperately trying to save progressive law enforcement agents who are directly responsible for the death and destruction.”

A recent effort by citizens to recall Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon is O’Reilly’s point of contention. He claims homicides are up 94% since Gascon took office in December of 2020. Shootings are up 54%, and O’Reilly pins those numbers on Gascon’s policy of criminal justice reform. O’Reilly used recent editorials from the California newspaper saying “the notion that a D.A. can make crime rise or fall over a period is absurd” as an example of this “unholy alliance”.

“What is absurd is that newspaper not processing the violent crime it reports on every day. That’s absurd,” O’Reilly argued. “The truth is the progressive movement believes the American criminal justice system is racist and wants to destroy it. The LA Times is part of the progressive movement. It has allied itself with that. And so, death in the streets of blighted neighborhoods really doesn’t matter for the greater good of criminal justice reform.”

Continue Reading

News Print & Digital

Axios, Cox Enterprises Reach Agreement on $525M Sale

The new deal will also include an additional investment of $25 million in Axios’ media branch

Eduardo Razo

Published

on

Axios has new owners as the company announced Monday that it agreed to sell to its most recent primary investor, Cox Enterprises. Furthermore, the agreement between the two companies is for $525 million. 

The deal is structured to secure investments that will continue to pour into local news after the company began providing coverage in 2020 after initially focusing on politics, tech, and business when it was founded in 2016. 

“A big part of this investment is to expand the number of local markets we serve. Local watchdog journalism is so important to the health of any community, and no one is more focused on building that out nationally than Axios,” Cox chairman and CEO Alex Taylor said.

The new deal will also include an additional investment of $25 million in Axios’ media branch to assist the company in growing across its local, national, and subscription news products.

“This is great for Axios, for our shareholders and American journalism. It allows us to think and operate generationally, with a like-minded partner — and build something great and durable that lives long after we are gone,” Axios CEO Jim VandeHei said.

Continue Reading

News Print & Digital

Elon Musk Offers Twitter CEO Debate On Bots

“I hereby challenge @paraga to a public debate about the Twitter bot percentage. Let him prove to the public that Twitter has <5% fake or spam daily users!"

Published

on

Billionaire Elon Musk challenged Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal to a public debate on the subject of fake accounts and spam over the weekend.

Musk and Twitter are currently in legal proceedings over a $44 billion takeover offer from the Tesla and SpaceX executive. Musk filed a bid with Securities and Exchange Commission to purchase Twitter in April. After both parties agreed to the deal, Musk made the decision to terminate the deal, accusing Twitter of providing him with incorrect numbers in regards to the amount of daily users that are not spam or bot accounts. In retaliation, Twitter sued Musk to ensure the deal would go through.

A Twitter thread by Andrea Stroppa detailed the allegations made by Musk. Musk replied by saying “Good summary of the problem. If Twitter simply provides their method of sampling 100 accounts and how they’re confirmed to be real, the deal should proceed on original terms. However, if it turns out that their SEC filings are materially false, then it should not.”

Musk later asked followers whether they believed less than 5% of Twitter’s daily users were bots or spam. He later tweeted “I hereby challenge @paraga to a public debate about the Twitter bot percentage. Let him prove to the public that Twitter has <5% fake or spam daily users!”

According to a report from CNBC, a source close to Twitter said a debate “is not going to happen outside of a pending trial”.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Barrett Media Writers

Copyright © 2021 Barrett Media.