When was the last time you looked for a job?
Not a job in radio, but a real job?
With all this talk of the national economy on the rebound, and with stories of companies begging for workers, I decided to look for a job. A side hustle, just for fun, to see what else I could do. I wanted to see what type of opportunities were out there for a mid 50’s man, with hard to define professional experiences and skills. But experience and skills, nonetheless.
I learned, the place NOT to look for a job are the job websites.
I found two types of jobs;
1) You need an MBA in a related field, 10 years of experience or equivalent. One of the preferred qualifications, and I quote; a “Strong Internal teammate, transparent in all aspects of work, systemic, ability to advocate for others, analytical with strong training and negotiation skills.” Starting salary, $21.75/hour.
2) No experience necessary, earn while you learn. From home. Part time. You will need high speed internet. Starting salary, $5,000-$10,000/month.
So, I need an MBA to make $21.75 an hour, or no experience necessary to make $10,000 a month. Easy decision, glad I didn’t go to business school.
It gets worse.
The website asked me to upload my resume, which I did. Their computer’s artificial intelligence program scanned the words and spit out job offers. As Program Director of a radio station, I was thrilled to learn that I could be “Director of Sandwiches” at Subway. Starting salary $15.00 plus bonus. After I pass a drug test and spend 6 months on the job, I would earn an extra $250 bonus. Not $250 extra a week or month. Just a one-time extra $250 check.
Ever wonder what skills we have amassed in the radio industry? Public Relations, marketing, social media? Yeah, me too. So I checked out public relations, marketing and social media jobs.
I could become a social media content moderator.
“The employee will be an essential component of our client’s safety effort. We are looking for someone who can apply our guidelines with reference to nuanced and context-dependent policies in an evolving environment. You will make autonomous decisions against challenging issues of a potentially sensitive or business-critical nature. Starting Salary $17.00/hour.”
Let me get this right, you are going to leave sensitive or business-critical nature autonomous decisions to someone you are only going to pay $17.00/hour?
How about public relations?
Do I have the skills to “Support building non-traditional talent pipelines by managing products that support partnering with educational institutions, workforce development, faith-based and community organizations, opportunity youth, vocational rehabilitation, military and mature worker partnerships?” I don’t think so. I could however host or emcee a charity dinner.
Could I, “provide communications consulting to large case clients on benefit communications. Consulting activity that will vary from verbal communications or advice on communications issues to providing customized communications materials?”
I could do a live read.
The employer posts jobs on job boards because they have to “post the job” to the outside world. After three weeks, they hire the person they wanted to hire in the first place. The employee might really be looking for a job, but these job descriptions are so obtuse they could apply to anyone or no one. The job seeker, more than likely, has to fill out so many job applications to qualify for their unemployment benefits. So the employer and employee really aren’t looking for employees or jobs, they are just looking to fulfill some silly requirements.
I remembered a conversation I had a few years ago with a CEO of a major St Louis company. He volunteered that if he ever got fired, he didn’t have any transferable skills and wouldn’t know how to go about finding another job. To be fair, he was treating a few of us to lunch, after a round of golf at his country club, so he wasn’t too worried about his next landing spot.
Looking for a job in 2021 left me exhausted and defeated. After 25 years in radio, I really don’t have any other skills other than talking on the radio. If and when I am tapped on the shoulder and asked to bring my playbook to the corner office, I will have to go find a real job, and that is scarier than sitting at a microphone with one hour left in the show and nothing to talk about.
End The Shtick: Mispronouncing Last Names Isn’t Funny
Ah-det-oh-KOON-boh if you’re using the Yoruba pronunciation. Or, you say An-tet-oh-KOON-poh in Greek.
That’s how you properly pronounce the last name of Giannis Antetokounmpo. He’s only one of the most popular players in the NBA, a two-time MVP and recently crowned champion.
When you’re preparing for a broadcast, taking the time to learn how to accurately say the name of one of the subjects should be the norm. It’s disrespectful not to. Google and YouTube can be your best friends for phonetic breakdowns.
End the shtick. Be better at your job.
Can you imagine if Mike Tirico and the dozens of other broadcasters working the Olympics for NBC just decided not to learn how to properly pronounce the last names of competing athletes? It would sound foolish.
This is where news anchors, in all size markets, deserve more recognition for properly doing their jobs. Do you know how quickly all credibility of a broadcast would disappear if the anchor refused to learn how to pronounce the names of foreign diplomats?
We need to stop giving sports broadcasters a free pass to sound uneducated.
Early in a broadcast career you’re basically a sponge. Personally, I liked to sit back, take notes, and really learn from those who have done it much longer than I could dream of.
Vividly I recall sitting in a very small, and hot, press box, shadowing a play-by-play broadcast for the Madison Mallards of the Northwoods League. I doubt I was even cleared to talk on the radio yet, so it really was just a learning experience.
The Northwoods League is a summer baseball league for current college athletes.
Gabe Neitzel was calling the game for ESPN Madison, where I interned during school. Late in the broadcast I remember a representative from the opposing team approaching him and letting him know that he had been saying the last name of one of their players wrong.
He was pissed.
Not because someone had corrected him but because someone hadn’t corrected him sooner. There was a misprint in the pronunciation guide. Neitzel quickly fixed his error and continued calling the game.
Afterwards he said that he was a “broadcast diva” and liked to make sure he was saying everything correctly. I thought to myself, that’s not diva-ish at all, you just like to say names the right way. As the athlete probably very much appreciated. I know I did.
Listening to Tirico during the opening ceremonies, I enjoyed the effort he and his team put in to learning how to flawlessly say every single flag bearers name. That’s also why I get so frustrated when I hear Major League Baseball announcers refuse to acknowledge that some letters in Spanish are pronounced much differently than in English. Take a class. Rosetta Stone. Learn the basics.
Once again, Google is a great resource.
During the 2021 NFL Draft the Baltimore Ravens selected Odafe Oweh. Except until draft night he had gone by his middle name “Jayson” because he felt Odafe was too hard for others to pronounce. When he switched back to his real name he said people were just going to have to get used to it.
As they should. Good for you, Odafe. Sorry you felt you had to go by a different name for so long because others refused to adapt.
I don’t want to sound as if I am the most refined broadcaster in the world. Far far far from it. However, there is a certain level of respect, in my opinion, that comes with accurately saying someone’s name. Making up a nickname because you’re uncomfortable with the pronunciation isn’t the move. Purposely sounding ignorant isn’t either.
Side note: Giannis isn’t said with a ‘gee’ to start, it’s ‘yaa.’
Media Forced to Cover the News
In the piece, the Fox News talk host opined that Big Media was forced to cover the scourge of the inner-city violence epidemic after a recent shooting outside a baseball game at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C.
They say the key to effective humor is making sure the joke contains at least a little bit of truth. You get right up to the line and then hit the punch line, leaving your audience wondering exactly where the truth ended and the ridicule began.
Of this, Fox’s Greg Gutfeld is a master.
The comedian/television talk show host has a knack for hitting home with real people, by feeling what they feel and expressing those thoughts in a cogent, funny, and often irreverent manner.
Last week, Gutfeld penned an opinion piece on FoxNews.com, in which he took aim at the mainstream liberal media, specifically CNN. The title of his piece was Greg Gutfeld: The crime problem the media pretends doesn’t exist actually found them at a baseball game.
In the piece, the Fox News talk host opined that Big Media was forced to cover the scourge of the inner-city violence epidemic after a recent shooting outside a baseball game at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. Many fault the corporate media for downplaying the escalating violence and rioting in Democrat-controlled inner cities in recent years.
Gutfeld, co-host of the networks The Five, and host of Gutfeld!, says the recent incident forced their hand and made them discuss the issue.
“Now obviously CNN covered the shooting, doing live shots outside the center field gate,” Gutfeld wrote on FoxNews.com. “Why is that important? Because it was refreshing to finally see CNN cover a crime story. For once. If you watched their network you were told crime was largely made up of hysteria. Just an idea, but nothing real.”
In reading Gutfield’s comments, one can recall the infamous clip of the reporter standing in front of fire-filled riots last year, telling viewers it was a “largely peaceful protest.”
Gutfeld had previously commented that the only way big, corporate media would cover crime is if they were impacted. This game, he said, forced them to face the issue and report the facts that have been affecting much of America, outside the media bubble.
“For a brief moment that bubble popped Saturday night at a baseball game – where the true reality of our crime epidemic hit home, or rather home plate,” Gutfeld wrote. “They got a taste of how the rest of DC lives. Where policies the media supports have turned their neighborhoods into a John Wick movie.”
Gutfeld will continue to be irreverent, as he has been since he joined the network in 2007. He’ll surely continue to deride and mock the Left and their establishment media elite, right up to the line.
He summed up his piece, writing, “So will they learn any lessons from this? Will they reexamine their news coverage, especially regarding crime, and how they dropped that ball when it should have been a routine catch? Of course not. They’ll forget about it by tonight. And say the game was postponed due to climate change.”
Tony Katz: Facebook Should Act Like a Platform, Not a Publisher
Last week, White House press secretary Jen Psaki told Fox News reporter Peter Doocy that the government is partnering with Facebook to quash misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines.
If you have ever been censored, throttled, or banned from Facebook or any other social media platform because of your political beliefs, it’s likely that you will agree that we are witnessing the erosion of our right to free speech.
Big Tech has gone out of its way to censor conservative voices. The most prominent example, former President Donald Trump who was banned from Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter following the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg released a statement several months ago accusing Trump of undermining the “peaceful and lawful transition of power to his elected successor.” A bold assertion from a man whose company routinely allows content to be published that depicts things like underage sex, self-harm, fake news, and anti-police rhetoric.
While some prominent conservatives like Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Charlie Kirk have pushed back against the obvious bias being carried out by Big Tech, censorship continues at a rampant pace.
Last week, White House press secretary Jen Psaki told Fox News reporter Peter Doocy that the government is partnering with Facebook to quash misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines. Psaki’s statement sent shockwaves through the conservative talk community, fueling speculation that Silicon Valley is just an extension of the mainstream media dominated by liberals.
Award-winning Indianapolis radio host Tony Katz spoke to Barrett News Media this week about the Facebook platform. Tony Katz and the Morning News airs weekdays on 93.1FM WIBC. He also hosts the Midwest syndicated Tony Katz Today radio program.
Ryan Hedrick: Do you routinely make use of Facebook to promote your show?
Tony Katz: Yes. Facebook.com/tonykatztoday
RH: How should Facebook decide what’s allowed on its social network?
TK: Facebook should act as a platform, not a publisher. Outside of overt calls for violence, child endangerment or flagrant pornography (what one could consider accepted standards), Facebook should stay out of editing content.
RH: How aggressively should Facebook monitor and remove controversial posts?
TK: With the poor job they do of defining “controversial,” the aggression level is immaterial.
RH: Have you experienced being banned or warned?
TK: Once we had a post that got a warning
RH: Is Facebook good for democracy?
TK: It’s not as good as a free press that is more interested in journalism than narrative, but it doesn’t hurt.
RH: Do you feel Facebook has become a monopoly?
TK: Popularity is different from monopoly. Still time for people who can write big checks to invest in tech companies that will embrace free speech. Same with investing in film, TV, and publishing.
Sports Radio News2 days ago
KFAN’s Zach Halverson Comes Out As Gay On Air
Sports Radio News2 days ago
Adam Hawk Leaves Jim Rome Show
Sports Radio News10 hours ago
Chris Bleck & Adam Abdalla Made It Hard For ESPN 1000 to Say No
Sports Online8 hours ago
Agent: Barstool Could Be A Force In Athlete Representation