Major League Baseball made its much-anticipated debut on Apple TV Plus last week. To say fans hated it would be an understatement. They seemed to miss their hometown announcers, a smooth stream of the game, and well, just being able to see the game without a glitch.
I did not watch either of the doubleheader games live but did go back and watch a good portion of both via replay. I left with a mixed bag of feelings about the production, audio, camera shots, announcing teams, and the value of these broadcasts. Fans had many opinions for sure.
From checking out social media, I gathered many complaints from the audience that was watching the opening Apple doubleheader. They hit on a few central themes, one being the actual broadcast stream.
It’s never a good thing when the broadcast crashes midway through the game. That was the case with the Mets/Nationals game for many, if not all viewers. Fans were critical of a company like Apple not being able to provide perfect streaming of this game.
For me, the replay of the game didn’t have these glitches and the actual quality of the stream looked very good, if not excellent at all times. But, when you’re Apple, the tech giant, and you’re trying to convince fans of these teams to watch the game on Apple TV Plus, glitches, drops and audio problems are not acceptable. When the stream cut out, viewers got an error message that read: “There’s a problem loading this video. If this continues, check your internet connection.”
The free service went out shortly before 5 PM Pacific time for some viewers watching the Washington Nationals and New York Mets game. DownDetector.com reported a sudden spike in complaints of outages and inability to log in. Players that make errors like that are usually sent to the minors.
This should be an area of concern for those in Cupertino, California. Evan Roberts, the afternoon co-host on WFAN in New York, is one that is not on board with what Apple is doing here. He summed up what a lot of Mets fans were thinking and feeling last Friday.
It was reported that those viewing the game on their phone were able to see the action.
There were other reported technology issues. Fans were unable to use the normal playback controls afforded by an Apple TV stream. They couldn’t pause, rewind or fast-forward during the game.
Now, to the defense of Apple, the company did say that these controls were not supported during the Friday Night Baseball games on its site. Still, after reading many of the comments, this might be something Apple should look into. I’m not sure if there are MLB rules that prohibit this. To me this is a “would really love to have” rather than an “I’m not watching because of” situation.
The other major complaint was the announce teams. Some described using the mute button because of distracting, off-topic commentary. Instead of focusing on the game, viewers said the announcers talked about squirrels, Japanese restaurants, and even Apple Products. There were viewers that didn’t feel like the announce teams had baseball experience.
The main play-by-play people surely do have experience in MLB. Melanie Newman is one of the radio broadcasters for the Orioles. She’ll be adding some MLB Network duties this year as well. Stephen Nelson works for MLB and NHL Networks. So that should dispel the notion.
I think it’s hard for these broadcasters to live up to the mark that the local broadcasters make on their respective fan bases. A lot of comments on Twitter read something to the effect of “these guys aren’t Gary, Keith and Ron” (SNY’s New York Mets local crew).
No, they aren’t, but they never pretended to be either. I’ve always thought it was unfair to compare a national broadcast to a local one. The hometown announcers are around that team all year and in a lot of cases, for many years. Who knows how much access the Apple announcers had with each team?
I didn’t have the same opinion about the banter during the game. In all fairness, they were all working together for the first time as a team. Chemistry in that case doesn’t always come together quickly. It takes some time to feel things out and to see what everyone’s strengths are.
The only thing I will say about the broadcasters is that there was a little too much talk for a television broadcast. At times the games sounded as though they were being done on the radio. The action didn’t have a chance to breathe. In all fairness to the Mets/Nationals crew, the night got off to a rocky start at the stadium. At Nationals Park, the lights took forever to turn on and it caused a long delay. There was a lot of air to cover.
If Apple and MLB leave these crews together, it will get much better as time goes on.
A couple of other minor things that seemed to irk viewers included a constant graphic in the bottom right corner of the screen. The graphic had real-time probabilities, like for a player reaching base or a pitcher recording a strikeout. The graphics also included betting odds.
It was a little distracting to me. The graphics were very plain and at some points, they seemed to mix into the action and almost disappear. That information wasn’t needed for the entire game and might have been better served appearing on a ‘crawl’ at the bottom of the screen.
During the Mets/Nationals game, there was an ugly incident when Nats reliever Steve Cishek hit Mets infielder, Francisco Lindor, in the helmet with a pitch. The benches cleared and there were some heated exchanges. After Cishek was ejected, the announce team brought in rules analyst, former MLB umpire Brian Gorman for his thoughts.
I’m not sure where Gorman was coming to us from, but he looked like someone that had never used Zoom or anything like it before. He was looking down at the camera and there was a distractingly large amount of headroom in the shot. The info was good, but come on! The camera angle and presentation at that moment were very amateurish.
Speaking of cameras, the use of “the megalodon” is always very cool, but the use of the depth of field camera in Anaheim was jarring. Especially during Heidi Watney’s on-field report early in the broadcast. The camera kept circling her and circling her and circling her. I was getting nauseous.
Ok, Apple’s first foray into baseball wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t all bad. Aesthetically the game looked great from the Big A in Anaheim. The picture was crisp, the audio was clean for the most part and the cameras they used seemed to be extra-high def. The entire presentation was so clear that I forgot for a moment I was streaming this game.
One of the first things I noticed was just the plainness of the score bug. It looked primitive. At first, it looked out of place and I kept thinking, Apple paid how much again for these rights and this is what they’re giving me? As the game went on, I didn’t mind it all that much. It wasn’t too obtrusive or ‘loud’, so it was fine. It wasn’t constantly bombarding me with information, like the horribly obtrusive Bally’s bug that never stops.
It’s a lesson in, simple can be good and enjoyable. It was pointed out by some experts on Twitter, including Brandon Costa of Sports Video Group, that the graphics were very on brand with Apple. He indicated that the font used was one frequently displayed by Apple.
Staying with the positives, it was cool to hear and see Nationals superstar Juan Soto mic’d up for the game against the Mets. His personality is one that is needed in the game and he didn’t disappoint. The infectious smile and youthful exuberance can be something to attract younger fans without forcing things down people’s throats. He was interviewed during the light delay and pleaded with Apple to provide his teammates and coaches with Apple TV, iPads, iPhones and AirPods. Pretty funny stuff.
To many the first impression wasn’t great and as that old dandruff shampoo commercial says, you never get a second chance to make a first impression. But in this case, there is always another game, or in the case of Apple, games, to broadcast. It will get better, it has to, Apple has too much invested in the product. MLB needs this to work as well to keep the cash cow producing its milk.
There will have to be some changes to the Apple telecast. Give people what they want. Give them the ‘pause and rewind’ features they are used to having. Make sure that the glitches are taken care of and make it easy for fans of all ages and technological expertise to see the broadcasts.
All that’s left to wonder now? Will baseball fans give Apple TV Plus a legitimate chance to be one of the main carriers of Major League Baseball?
Right now it doesn’t appear its trending in that direction.
Adam The Bull Is Giving Cleveland Something It’s Never Had Before
“It was only more recently that I was like why do I have to only be a radio guy?”
After spending 22 years on the radio, Adam “The Bull” Gerstenhaber was ready for a new adventure. In fact, the former co-host of Bull and Fox on 92.3 The Fan in Cleveland did not have a new job lined up when he signed off from his 11-year radio home last month.
“I was already leaving without having a new project,” admitted Gerstenhaber during a recent phone interview with BSM. “I left before I knew for sure I had a ‘next project’.”
Gerstenhaber was preparing for his final show with co-host Dustin Fox on April 1st when he was contacted by an executive producer for TEGNA, a company that was developing a Cleveland sports television show on YouTube. The executive producer, who had just found out that Bull was a free agent, made it clear that he wanted Bull to be a part of the new project.
It all came together very quickly.
“Let’s talk on Monday,” Gerstenhaber told the executive producer. “And within a week they signed me up.”
The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show on YouTube featuring Gerstenhaber, former ESPN personality Jay Crawford, 92.3 The Fan’s Garrett Bush, and rotating hosts to make up a four-person round-table show, made its debut last Monday. The show, which airs weekdays from 11am to 1pm, features passionate Cleveland sports talk, live guests, either in-studio or via Zoom, as well as interaction from the audience through social media.
“I’m very excited,” said Gerstenhaber. “It’s a definite adjustment for me after 22 years on radio doing television. For the last 11 years, I’ve been doing a radio show with just one other host and I was the lead guy doing most of the talking and now I’m on a show with three other people and it’s such an adjustment. So far, I’m having a ball.”
And so far, the reaction to the show has been very positive.
A big reason why is that it’s something that Cleveland didn’t have and really never had, unlike a city like New York, where there are local radio shows that are simulcast on regional sports channels.
“There’s nothing like that in Cleveland,” said Gerstenhaber. “And there was certainly nothing like this with a panel. Cleveland is such a massive sports town and now people that don’t live in Cleveland that are maybe retired in Florida or Arizona, now they actually have a TV show that they can watch that’s Cleveland-centric.”
The new venture certainly represents a big change in what Bull has been used to in his radio career. He’s enjoying the freedom of not having to follow a hard clock for this show. In fact, there have already been some occasions where the show has been able to go a little longer than scheduled because they have the flexibility to do that on YouTube.
Doing a show on YouTube gives the panel a great opportunity to go deep into topics and spend some quality time with guests. And while there is no cursing on the show at the moment, there could be the potential for that down the road.
Don’t expect the show is going to become X-rated or anything like that, but the objective is to be able to capture the spirit and emotion of being a sports fan and host.
“It’s something we may do in the future,” said Gerstenhaber. “Not curse just to curse but it gives us the option if we get fired up. It is allowed because there’s no restrictions there. The company doesn’t want us to do it at the moment.”
There’s also been the shift for Gerstenhaber from being the “point guard” on his old radio show, driving the conversation and doing most of the talking, to now taking a step back and having Crawford distributing the ball on the television show.
For a guy called “The Bull”, that will take some getting used to.
“Jay is a pro’s pro,” said Gerstenhaber. “He’s the point guard for this but he’s also part of the conversation. I’m not used to not being the point guard so I have to adjust to that. I think it’s gone pretty well and the chemistry is pretty good and with time we’ll get used to the flow of it.”
Gerstenhaber’s move from sports radio to an internet television show is a perfect example of how the industry is changing. A good portion of the listening and viewing audience these days, especially those in the younger demographic, are not necessarily watching traditional television or listening to terrestrial radio. For a lot of sports fans, watching and listening on a mobile device or a computer has become a very important way of life.
The desire to adapt, along with a shorter workday, was very enticing to him.
“It was only more recently that I was like why do I have to only be a radio guy?” wondered Gerstenhaber. “There were things about my job that I was unhappy about. I was doing a five-hour radio show. It’s too long. That’s crazy. Nobody should be doing a five-hour radio show at this point.”
Broadcasting on the internet has arrived and it’s not just a couple of sports fans doing a show from their garage anymore. The business has evolved to the point where the technology has provided more opportunities for those who have already enjoyed success in the industry and are looking for new challenges.
Kind of like Adam The Bull!
“I think years ago, probably like many people in the radio business, we looked at internet and podcasts as like whatever…those guys aren’t professionals…they’re amateurs,” said Gerstenhaber. “But the game has changed.”
Gerstenhaber, Crawford and everyone associated with the “Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show” should not have much of a problem attracting the younger audience. That demographic is already accustomed to watching shows on YouTube and other streaming platforms. The challenge now is to get the more mature audience on board. There are certainly some obstacles there.
I know this from experience with trying to explain to my mother in Florida how she can hear me on the radio and watch me on television simply by using her tablet.
Bull can certainly relate to that.
“My mother is still trying to figure out how to watch the show live,” said Gerstenhaber with a chuckle. “The older fans struggle with that. A lot of my older fans here in Cleveland are like how do I watch it? For people that are under 40 and certainly people that under 30, watching a YouTube show is like okay I watch everything on my phone or device. It’s such a divide and obviously as the years go by, that group will increase.”
With the television show off and running, Gerstenhaber still has a passion for his roots and that’s the radio side of the business. In the next couple of weeks, “The Bull” is set to announce the launch of two podcasts, one daily and one weekly, that will begin next month. But he also hasn’t ruled out the possibility of returning to terrestrial radio at some point.
“I have not closed the door to radio,” said Gerstenhaber. “I still love radio. I would still, in the right set of circumstances, consider going back to radio but it would have to really be the perfect situation. I’m excited about (the television show) and right now I don’t want to do anything else but I’m certainly going to remain open-minded to radio if a really excellent opportunity came up.”
The landscape of the broadcasting industry, particularly when it comes to sports, has certainly changed over the years and continues to evolve. Adam Gerstenhaber certainly enjoyed a tremendous amount of success on the radio side, both in New York and in Cleveland, but now he has made the transition to something new with the YouTube television show and he’s committed to making it a success.
Why You Should Be Making Great TikTok Content
“We’re specially trained in the world of TSL (time spent listening), and the longer people view your content on TikTok, the more the app rewards you by shoving your content into more and more feeds.”
It feels like there’s a new social media platform to pay attention to every other week. That makes it easy to overlook when one of them actually presents value to your brand. It wasn’t long ago that TikTok was primarily used by teenagers with the focus being silly dance trends filmed for video consumption with their friends and followers alike. Now, as the general public has become in tune with how this complicated app works, it’s grown far beyond that.
TikTok is now an app used by all types of demographics and unlike TikTok’s closely related cousins Instagram and Facebook, this app provides a certain type of nuance that I think people in our line of work can really excel in.
Before I get into the nuts and bolts of how you can use TikTok to your advantage and how to make your videos catch on, I think it’s important to first mention why this matters for you. Now, if I’m being realistic, I’m sure there are some that have already stopped reading this or those that could scroll away fast enough when they saw the words TikTok. You might be thinking that this doesn’t fit your demo, or maybe that it’s a waste of time because productivity here won’t directly lead to an uptick in Nielsen ratings. But I’m not sure any social network directly leads to what we ultimately get judged on, and we aren’t always pumping out content directly to our core audience.
TikTok, like any other app you may use, is marketing. This is another free tool to let people out there know who you are and what you offer in this endless sea of content. And the beauty of TikTok is that it directly caters its algorithm to content creators just like us. Bottom line, if you are a personality in sports talk, there’s no reason you can’t be crushing it on TikTok right now. All it takes is a little direction, focus, consistency, and a plan.
Unlike Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter where you can throw a photo up with a caption and be done for the day, TikTok’s whole model is built on creative videos that keep users engaged for longer periods of time. This approach works. According to Oberlo, a social media stat tracking site, people spend more time per day on TikTok than any other popular social media application. 38 minutes per day!
This is where this is good news for us in talk radio. We’re specially trained in the world of TSL (time spent listening), and the longer people view your content on TikTok, the more the app rewards you by shoving your content into more and more feeds. TikTok’s algorithm doesn’t care how many followers you have, your level of credibility, or the production on your video. All ir cares about is 1) Is your content good. and 2) Are people watching it. 3) How long are they watching it. The more people watch and the longer they watch creates a snowball effect. Your videos views will skyrocket, sometimes within hours.
So, how do you create content that will catch on? It’s really not all that different than what you do every day. Create thought-provoking commentary that makes people think, argue, or stay till the end to get the info you teased up for them. I’ve found through my own trial and error that it’s best if you stay away from time-sensitive material, I’ve had more success the more evergreen my content is. That way, the shelf life expands beyond just that day or week. This is different for everyone and there’s no one-size-fits-all, but this is where I’ve seen the most success.
Also, put yourself out there, don’t be afraid to say something that people are going to vehemently disagree with. Again, it’s not unlike what we do every day. It’s one thing to get someone to listen, it’s another to get them to engage. Once they hit you in the comment section, you’ve got them hooked. Comments breed more views and on and on. But don’t just let those sit there, even the smallest interaction back like a shoulder shrug emoji can go a long way in creating more play for your video.
If you want to grow quickly, create a niche for yourself. The best content creators that I follow on TikTok all put out very similar content for most of their videos. This means, unlike Instagram where it’s great to show what a wildly interesting and eclectic person you are, TikTok users want to know what they’re getting the second your face pops up on that screen. So if you are the sports history guy, be the sports history guy all the time. If you are the top 5 list guy, be the top 5 list guy all the time, and on and on, you get the point.
Other simple tricks:
- Splice small videos together. Don’t shoot one long video.
- 90 seconds to 2 minutes is a sweet spot amount of time.
- Add a soft layer of background instrumental music (this feature is found in the app when you are putting the finishing touches on your video)
- Label your video across the screen at the start and time it out so that it disappears seconds later. This way a user gets an idea of what the content is immediately and then can focus on you delivering your message thereafter.
- Research trending hashtags, they are far more important than whatever you caption your video.
- Use closed captions so that people can follow your video without sound.
Finally, don’t be intimidated by it or snub your nose at it. Anything that helps your brand is worth doing and anything worth doing is worth doing well.
Does Tom Brady’s Salary Make Sense For FOX In a Changing Media World?
“The risk here doesn’t have to do with Brady specifically, but rather the business of televising football games in general.”
FOX is playing it too safe when it comes to adding Tom Brady.
That’s going to sound weird given the size of Brady’s broadcasting contract. Even if that deal isn’t worth as much as initially reported, it’s a hell of a lot of loot, especially considering Brady has remained steadfastly uninteresting for a solid 20 years now.
Let’s not pretend that is a detriment in the eyes of a television network, however. There’s a long line of famous athletes companies like FOX have happily paid millions without ever requiring them to be much more than consistently inoffensive and occasionally insightful. Yes, Brady is getting more money than those previous guys, but he’s also the most successful quarterback in NFL history.
The risk here doesn’t have to do with Brady specifically, but rather the business of televising football games in general. More specifically, the fact that the business of televising football games is changing, and while it may not be changing quite as rapidly as the rest of the sports-media industry, but it is changing. There’s an increasing number of choices available to viewers not only in the games that can be watched, but how they are consumed. Everything in the industry points to an increasingly fragmented audience and yet by signing Brady to be in the broadcast booth once he retires, FOX is paying a premium for a single component in a tried-and-true broadcasting formula will be more successful.
Think of Brady’s hiring as a bet FOX made. A 10-year commitment in which it is doubling down on the status quo at a time of obvious change. FOX saw ESPN introduce the ManningCast last year, and instead of seeing the potential for a network to build different types of products, FOX decided, “Nah, we don’t want to do anything different or new.” Don’t let the price tag fool you. FOX went out and bought a really famous former player to put in a traditional broadcast booth to hope that the center holds..
Maybe it will. Maybe Brady is that interesting or he’s that famous and his presence is powerful enough to defy the trends within the industry. I’m not naive enough to think that value depends on the quality of someone’s content. The memoir of a former U.S. president will fetch a multi-million-dollar advance not because of the literary quality, but because of the size of the potential audience. It’s the same rationale behind FOX’s addition of Brady.
But don’t mistake an expensive addition from an innovative one. The ManningCast was an actual innovation. A totally different way of televising a football game, and while not everyone liked it, some people absolutely loved it. It’s not going to replace the regular Monday Night Football format, but it wasn’t supposed to. It’s an alternative or more likely a complement and ESPN was sufficiently encouraged to extend the ManningCast through 2024. It’s a different product. Another option it is offering its customers. You can choose to watch to the traditional broadcast format with Joe Buck and Troy Aikman in the booth or you can watch the Mannings or you can toggle between both. What’s FOX’s option for those audience members who prefer something like the ManningCast to the traditional broadcast?
It’s not just ESPN, either. Amazon offered viewers a choice of broadcasters, too, from a female announcing tandem of Hannah Storm and Andrea Kramer beginning in 2018 to the Scouts Feed with Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks in 2020.
So now, not only do viewers have an increasingly wide array of choices on which NFL games they can watch — thanks to Sunday Ticket — they in some instances have a choice of the announcing crew for that given game. Amid this economic environment, FOX not only decided that it was best to invest in a single product, but it decided to make that investment in a guy who had never done this particular job before nor shown much in the way of an aptitude for it.
Again, maybe Brady is the guy to pull it off. He’s certainly famous enough. His seven Super Bowl victories are unmatched and span two franchises, and while he’s denied most attempts to be anything approaching interesting in public over the past 20 years, perhaps that is changing. His increasingly amusing Twitter posts over the past 2 years could be a hint of the humor he’s going to bring to the broadcast booth. That Tampa Tom is his true personality, which remained under a gag order from the Sith Lord Bill Belichick, and now Brady will suddenly become football’s equivalent of Charles Barkley.
But that’s a hell of a needle to thread for anyone, even someone as famous as Brady, and it’s a really high bar for someone with no broadcasting experience. The upside for FOX is that its traditional approach holds. The downside, however, is that it is not only spending more money on a product with a declining market, but it is ignoring obvious trends within the industry as it does so.